C37.2-1996 Reaffirmation
Home Up About OPUS Search Take a Tutorial News Services Registration Subscribers Calendar of Events Newsletter Hot Links

WiseOwl
                                       
The Secure Automation Developer's Resource

 

C37.2 – 1996  Reaffirmation

Electronic Balloting Worked

 And With No Extensions To The Balloting Period!

John Tengdin, Editor-in-Chief
October 2001

Once in a while, in the great scheme of things, everything that is supposed to work does in fact work. Glory be – we just finished an electronic balloting without a major glitch. True, it was a reaffirmation ballot on “C37.2 – 1996 IEEE Standard Electric Power System Device Function Numbers and Contact Designations”.

Reaffirmation severely constrains a potential balloter

Although one has all the options as on a regular ballot – “Approve, No Comments” or “Approve, With Comments” or “Disapprove” – the practical effect is either to Approve or Disapprove.  Comments attached to Approve ballots, if pointing out typographic errors, will be reflected in an Errata sheet when the standard is reprinted. However, the document itself is not changed. On the other hand, any comments that are editorial or technical nature are forwarded to the Working Group for consideration when the standard is next revised. No further action is taken on such comments. Thus, if one feels strongly that the document should be revised now rather than reaffirmed, that person has no option but to vote “Disapprove”. If 25% of the ballots are “Disapprove”, then the reaffirmation fails and the Working Group must consider other options.

C37.2 is used by relay engineers

Standard C37.2 is the responsibility of the PES Substations Committee. However, they recognize that the function numbers are widely used by relay engineers. It is their shorthand notation on relay diagrams. When C37.2 was revised in 1996, it was done with strong input from the Power System Relaying Committee. PSRC established a special working group with particular emphasis on methods of representing multifunction devices. The standard has included, for many years, Device number 11 – multifunction device defined as “A device that performs three or more comparatively important functions that could only be designated by combining several device function numbers.” With the advent of microprocessor based relays that were true multifunction devices, utilities were looking for guidance on how to represent the all the functions on drawings. The PSRC working group developed the two alternate means of representation that are now in Annex A.1 of the 1996 standard.

As C37.2 was last updated in 1996, its five year life was about expire. Before the Substations Working Group C3 made a decision on how to proceed, they asked PSRC to review the present document. PSRC appointed an ad hoc task force, and their conclusion was that the 1996 standard should be reaffirmed. With that input, C3 voted to proceed on the reaffirmation route.

Ballot results

In the balloting, we did receive just one negative ballot. That person felt that the definition of multifunction devices was inadequate. When made aware of how the 1996 update had been accomplished, and of the fact that a PSRC task force had recommended reaffirmation, that person changed his vote to “Affirmative, No Comments”. No other negative ballots were received.

We did receive three “Approve, with Comments” ballots pointing out several typos that obviously were overlooked when the standard was published in 1996. As these were typographic errors, they will all be included in an Errata sheet.

Finally, there were several “Approve with Comments” ballots suggesting editorial changes. These will be filed for use by the working group the next time the standard is revised.

The invitation to electronic ballot was sent to the Substations Committee and the Power System Relaying Committee. Of those on the Email lists, 82 individuals signed up to ballot. Of the 82, 76 ballots were returned (92%). There were 73 affirmatives (100%), 3 abstentions and no negative ballots at the end of the 30 day balloting period. The results of the balloting are on the agenda for the IEEE Standards Association RevCom November 2001 meeting.

We’re told that such overwhelmingly positive results are unusual. Perhaps so, but the balloting clearly shows the continuing support for this shorthand notation that first appeared as a part of AIEE Standard No. 26 in 1928 for automatic substations! Back then, PSRC was a part of the Substations Committee.

The lasting message is this

If you sign up to ballot on an IEEE standard, get your ballot in on time. Even better, get it in well before the end of the 30 day balloting period. You’ll be doing the Working Group Chair a great favor by doing so. It will minimize his efforts to cajole the tardy ones to vote.

Where do you want to go now?

Back Up Next

 
Send mail to postmaster@opusss.com with questions or comments about this web site.
OPUS Publishing and OPUS Subscription Service are trademarks of OPUS Publishing. All other products mentioned are registered trademarks or trademarks of their respective companies.
Copyright © 2001 OPUS Publishing. All rights reserved.
Last modified: Sunday August 01, 2004 .